logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.01 2013노1430
업무상횡령
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Article 1 (1) of the facts constituting an offense in the judgment of the court below (attached Form 1) of the defendant A (the part on the list of crimes in the attached Table 1) did not participate in or influence the decision of the court below for the payment of attorney's fees for the union of this case, and did not know the fact of payment. The part on Paragraph 2 (a) of the facts constituting an offense in the judgment of the court below is justifiable to cope with the issue related to the existence of the steering committee of this case. The part on Paragraph 2 (b) of the facts constituting an offense in the judgment of the court below (attached Form 2) did not instruct the operation of accounting documents, and even if not, the forgery of accounting documents does not constitute embezzlement, and all of them do not recognize the intention of illegal acquisition for the management committee of this case, and it cannot be viewed as embezzlement only with the use of the market funds in excess of the budget of 209 in the budget of 209.2) The part on the crime in the attached Table 3 (Attached Table 4) of the crime List) of the court below's.

3) Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendants guilty of all the charges, and there is an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles. (B) The sentence sentenced by the court below on the grounds of unfair sentencing (two years of suspended sentence in August of each of the defendants) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination: Ga. Ga.

arrow