The defendant shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.

The defendant in the factory room is a person who drives B cargo vehicle.

On January 18, 2018, when the driver of any motor vehicle drivess along the C Apartment-dong of the C Apartment-si on January 18, 2018, the driver of any motor vehicle shall not change the course when it is likely to impede the normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to which he/she intends to change the course of the motor vehicle.

The change of lanes to three lanes causes a traffic accident by hindering the passage of vehicles normally straighted in the third lane, which violates Article 19 (3) of the Road Traffic Act (violation of the method of change of lanes).

Maz.

A. The Defendant alleged to the effect that the Defendant did not change the course from the two lanes to the three lanes.

According to the investigation report (such as a copy of case forwarding note), the part on the left side side and back side of the vehicle driving by the defendant and the part on the back side and back side of the victim's vehicle were shocked. While the defendant cannot know the shock causes, while the driver of the damaged vehicle stated that the defendant's vehicle driving on the left side while driving the two-lanes of the three-lanes, the driver of the damaged vehicle stated that the shock was done while changing the course of the vehicle. As a result of the false horse detection inspection asking the defendant and the driver of the damaged vehicle "at the time of change of the vehicle," the driver of the damaged vehicle did not make any judgment, and on this basis, the defendant's request for a summary judgment was made.

B. The witness E, who observed the traffic accident scene immediately after the accident, appeared in this court, the defendant's cargo vehicle was moving in two laness, and the victim vehicle entering the above road at the top of the direction of the proceeding, stated that there was a conflict between the damaged vehicle entering the above road and the victim vehicle entering the above road.

In addition, the front part of the accident of this case is the back wheels part of the left side of the vehicle operated by the defendant and the back part of the victim's vehicle, and the shape of the trace of the damaged vehicle left by shock, and the defendant.