A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on March 1, 2016, at the C cafeteria located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, the State-si, upon receipt of a report on the state revocation column, solicited the Defendant to return home by asking the Defendant’s personal information; and (b) “C flap, N. N., N., who f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., e., f., f., e.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the lives, bodies, and property of the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of photograph (List 6) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. On the grounds of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, all of the sentencing factors in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, living environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be considered together, and the sentence shall be determined as ordered in the same manner, in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant (a confession, reflective nature, initial crime, and contingent crime in the state of spitation), unfavorable circumstances (a spiting or taking a bath against the police officer on duty in the course of performing his/her duties, etc.) and other factors that are favorable to the Defendant.