A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 8, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Jung-gu District Court on February 8, 2007, and issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a same crime at the Seoul East-gu District Court on June 5, 2009, and on September 11, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3.5 million as a fine for the same crime at the same court on September 11, 2009 and was punished for drinking driving two times or more.

On May 21, 2016, at around 02:05, the Defendant driven a Cinti Vehicle with a alcohol content of 0.149% 0.149% while under the influence of alcohol from around the 17-lane 17-ro, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 17-ro, 17-ro, 17-ro, 17-o.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Report on the circumstances of the driver's license at home and report on the circumstances of the driver's license at home;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (suspect's drinking force);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is very high, and the defendant should be sentenced to strict punishment in that he drives a motor vehicle by drinking again even though he has already been punished for driving four times of drinking.

However, there is no record of more severe punishment in addition to the fine above, and there is no record of punishment since 2009, and again, he does not drive drinking again.

In addition, the fact that the crime is divided in depth, and the vehicle is disposed of in order not to drive under the influence of alcohol.

It is decided as ordered in the Disposition in consideration of various sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, etc.