A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

B, C (one and half years of imprisonment on December 24, 2014, and two years of suspended execution), and D (one and half years of imprisonment on January 7, 2014, and two years of suspended execution) are for the collection of Chinese agricultural products, and the defendant is the wife B and C.

On April 4, 2013, the Defendant, at the front Ferter in Gunsan-si E on April 12, 2013, set aside “B” for the collection of Chinese agricultural products.

If the police promised to suspend the business during the period of control of illegal food concentration, why the business continues to be operated.

“A dispute between the victim G (51 3) and the victim G (51 h) and the victim’s knife with his hand, and the victim’s knife with his knife, and the victim’s knife with his knife, and the victim’s knife with his knife, and the victim’s knife with his knife at one time, and C had the victim’s knife’s knife part over the victim’s knife part

B continued to park gas sprayers, which are dangerous objects from one's own car that had been parked in the vicinity, when the head of the victim can be seen, the defendant, C, and D got out of the floor, respectively.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with B, C, D, and carrying dangerous articles, inflicted injury on the victim, such as the cutting of internal walls and internal walls that require approximately seven weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in relation to G, C, B, and D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Each court decision [the defendant's act is merely a defense of the victim's attack, and the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate defense. However, in light of the circumstances and contents of the crime of this case known by the records of this case, the degree of tangible power inflicted on the victim, the relationship between the defendant and the victim, the defendant's behavior at the time, etc., it is difficult to view that the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate defense to defend the present unfair infringement.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Articles 258-2(1) and 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts