All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (the Defendant A, B: the imprisonment of six months and the suspended sentence of two years; the community service order of 120 hours; the fine of two million won for Defendant C) against the Defendants is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant A and B assaulted the victims, such as leaving their heads who may be injured by a sacriffing, sacriffing, etc., for the sole reason that the payment of wages was not made, and damaged the on-site office in a non-discriminatory manner, and did not reach an agreement with the victims.

In light of the above circumstances, the lower court’s punishment against the above Defendants seems to be somewhat uneasible.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions including the following: (a) the degree of injury suffered by the victims is not relatively more severe; (b) Defendant A and B were in arrears with wages and seems to have caused contingent crimes in difficult circumstances; (c) Defendant C’s assault exercised by the police officer was not much serious to the extent that he was able to wear shoulder and arms; and (d) the Defendants were dissatisfying their mistakes, etc., it cannot be said that the lower court’s sentence against the Defendants is too unreasonable to the extent that the sentence against the Defendants is reversed.

3. In conclusion, since the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, it is dismissed in entirety under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.