Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Criminal facts

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

1. On May 7, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Road Traffic Act”) driving a B-pon freight vehicle around 15:50 on May 7, 2017, and driving a D-way road in front of the Busan Geum-gu C along the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the width.

In such cases, a person driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure the necessary distance to avoid a collision with the motor vehicle running ahead of it, and to prevent accidents by driving the motor vehicle at a safe speed and in a safe manner by keeping the right and the right of the front side well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found out that the Fchip car driven by the victim E (29) driven by the Defendant was at the latest stopping of the vehicle, and caused the Defendant to shock the vehicle behind the said victim’s vehicle due to the negligence, which led to the Defendant’s failure to stop.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, damaged the victim E by causing the injury to the fluor’s catum catum catum, etc., requiring two-day medical treatment to the fluor G (n, 29 years old) by catum catum catum, etc., requiring two-day medical treatment to the fluor H (n, 53 years old). At the same time, the Defendant damaged the fluor’s catum catum to the fluor I (56 years old) to the fluor’s catum and the left-hand catum catum, etc. requiring two-day medical treatment, and at the same time, damaged the f57,96 won repair cost of the fluoral catum catum.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance except for the motor vehicles prescribed by the Presidential Decree;

Nevertheless, the Defendant owned B Poter Cargo and operated the said automobile which was not covered by mandatory insurance, as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. A traffic accident report, an accident, or an accident;