A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:35 on January 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) in the “Eisco,” operated by the victim D (the 46-year old), which is located in Cheongju-si, U.S., and (b) in order to sell the garris collected by the Defendant, the Defendant and the victim have been interested in to sell the garris collected by the Defendant; (c) said, the victim would not add the price so that the son would reach, and (d) said, “the chlof, fife, fife, fiff, fiff,” and the victim would be fife at the left part of the Defendant’s fife, thereby threatening the victim by a dam in front of the chest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. The crime of this case’s reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (hereinafter referred to as the “instant reason for sentencing”) is one of the following: (a) the Defendant committed an act of intimidation using a knife similar to the instant crime even before 2012, and subsequently, was subject to suspension of indictment; (b) the Defendant committed an act of intimidation on the part of the victim’s chests; and (c) the Defendant, even though having been subject to suspension of indictment, is not less likely to have committed the instant crime of this case.

However, the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case by using a knife knife knife knife which he holds for the collection of ordinary knife, the defendant seriously reflects his wrongness, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and as above, the suspension of indictment does not have the same criminal records, and there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, and the favorable circumstances, age, character, occupation, and occupation of the defendant.