(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.06.17 2019누68239

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.06.17 2019누68239

소득세 등 부과처분 무효확인의 소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court accepted the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification or addition of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be accepted as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the second sentence of the court of first instance, the crime of "(sexual traffic advertisements)" shall be deemed to be "(sexual traffic advertisements)".

Under the second sentence of the first instance court, "from April 201 to June 2011" shall be deemed "from June 2011".

Following the fourth decision of the first instance court, the phrase "it is difficult to recognize the body" is as follows.

Although it is difficult to recognize the substance of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff and the E, as alleged by the Plaintiff, considering the fact that the Plaintiff and the E met through online, according to the Plaintiff’s statement, “the Plaintiff manages the instant site together from June 201 to September 2015,” and thereafter, received the right to operate the instant site from “E”.

"..." The plaintiff's failure to know about the specific personal information, contact information, and financial transaction information of the court of first instance, "........... the plaintiff failed to submit "........ even if it is based on the plaintiff's account transaction details (Evidence No. 9)." The plaintiff's assertion under the premise that there is a serious defect in the disposition of this case is serious, is without merit. The following contents are added under Chapter No. 8 of the court of first instance under the 5th judgment. Even if it is assumed that there is such defect as alleged by the plaintiff in the disposition of this case, the defect in the disposition of this case in light of the above legal principles."

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

-행정소송법 제8조 제2항

유사 판례

-광주고등법원 (전주) 2017.03.16 2016나10532

-서울고등법원 2020.07.22 2019누61047

-대전지방법원 2016.02.18 2015나5918

-대전지방법원 2015.12.24 2014나15611

-부산고등법원(창원) 2020.06.10 2020누10251