Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 26, 2017, the Defendant insultd the victim on May 26, 2017, the following: (a) the Defendant: (b) made a dispute with the victim C (V, 70 years old), D (V, 77 years old) who is a community resident; and (c) made a noise to the victim C among the residents in the village E and F reported by the victim; and (b) made a noise to the victim C, “I am Rab Rabp by being followed by the door door hack in this year; and (d) the victim D’s identity to the victim D, “I Rab h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

2. On July 24, 2017, the Defendant insulting the victim on July 24, 2017, around the center for older persons as described in paragraph (1) around July 16:00, and the Defendant publicly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim on July 24, 2017 due to the flood compensation for the warehouse leased and used by the Defendant from the above B, on the following grounds: (a) the victim G, who was the head of the community (e.g., the age of 61); (b) the Defendant was in a dispute with the victim G (e.g., the age of 61); and (c) the Plaintiff went away from G; and (d) the 8 or 9 community residents, etc. are heard.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each legal statement of the witness G, C, D, E, F, and H;

1. Each police statement concerning G, C, D, E, and F;

1. Each complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the report of investigation (in relation to the scene photographs), field photographs, investigation reports (in relation to the movement of vehicles for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not the vehicle is false or not a false statement, the application of the Act and subordinate statutes of the report of this case

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant asserts that the judgment on the defendant's argument under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not contain any abusive behavior like the statement of facts constituting the crime.

Top, this Court has duly adopted it.