1. As to Defendant D Co., Ltd.’s KRW 205,427,170 and KRW 150,521,052 among them, Defendant D Co., Ltd.’s KRW 205,427,17.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the party E (hereinafter “instant condominium”) in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

(2) Defendant D Co., Ltd. (F Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Defendant F”) is a construction company that newly built and sold the instant aggregate building, and C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a litigation receipt company of Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a construction company that constructed the instant aggregate building.

B. Around August 30, 201, Defendant F, such as the public announcement of sale in lots and approval for use, issued a public announcement of the invitation of occupants to the instant aggregate building, and subsequently sold the instant aggregate building from August 31, 201 to September 2, 201, and obtained approval from the head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government for use of the instant aggregate building on November 26, 201.

C. 1) The defect occurrence and the defect repair cost of the instant aggregate building 1) Defendant B did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing while constructing the instant aggregate building, or performed the construction in a way different from the design drawing, etc. The Plaintiff continuously requested the Defendants to repair the defect before filing the instant lawsuit at the request of the occupants and sectional owners of the instant aggregate building. 2) The instant aggregate building had the same defects as indicated in the attached Table 1 2 25,970,00,000, 52,50,000, 308,520,520,000, 308,520,000, 2000, 308,520, 200, 201, 206, 206,306,308,300,000, 200, 200,000 won as indicated below.

(b) in paragraph 1.