The defendant confirms that the forest land B with 486m2 is owned by the plaintiff in Yongsan-si.

Costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Land Survey Book (Evidence No. 7-1) written during the Japanese occupation occupation point period is written as D’s assessment as to the land 147 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), and the said D’s address is not written.

B. The instant land did not recover from the owner without the partition and remains at present, and it was currently 486 square meters of forest land B with the wife population in Yongsan-si through the change of administrative district and conversion of area into a unit.

C. The former land cadastre (No. 4) on the instant land is written in D as the owner of the instant land is identical to that of the land survey.

On January 5, 1918, E, a deceased on January 5, 1918, and the son F (F, G) succeeded to Australia and the property independently. The F died on October 1, 1947, and the son H (H and I) solely succeeded to Australia and the property of the Republic of Korea. H died on September 17, 1950, and due to the death of the son, H (J, C, and C) succeeded to Australia and the property of the son on his own. The J was dead on October 15, 1975 (the expiration of the period during which it is unknown as of July 27, 1958) and the Plaintiff was the sole heir of the son’s external heir.

E. The instant land is unregistered until now.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry in Gap evidence 1 through 8 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the land under the circumstances of E, which is the high-helper of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s sole inheritance. As such, the Defendant is obligated to confirm that the instant land is owned by the Plaintiff.

B. The Defendant’s assertion that D and E, the Plaintiff’s preference, who is the name of the assessment of the instant land, cannot be deemed as the same person. Since there is a possibility that the instant land was disposed of in other ways during the period from 100 years to 100 years after the land assessment, the Plaintiff’s claim

C. The owner shall be the land survey division or forest survey division of the relevant legal doctrine.