Text
1. The supplementary appeal of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The following facts are either a dispute between the parties or a record.
Although the Plaintiff submitted a complaint in this case to the court of first instance on October 17, 2016, the duplicate, etc. of the complaint was not served to the defendant's domicile as stated in the above complaint because the defendant's director is unknown. According to the order to correct the address of the court of first instance on November 7, 2016 and November 22, 2016, the Plaintiff corrected the defendant's domicile as the defendant's resident registration address at each time. However, the duplicate, etc. of the complaint in this case was not served to each of the above defendant's addresses because the defendant's resident registration address was abolished or
On January 5, 2017, according to an order to rectify the address of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff re-amended the Defendant’s domicile to the Defendant’s domicile as “J building and 502, Sungnam-si, which is the Defendant’s resident registration address (hereinafter “instant address”). On January 23, 2017, the court of first instance served the instant complaint, etc. to the instant address by serving the enforcement officer, and on February 9, 2017, K, who is the Defendant’s cohabitant, received the duplicate of the said complaint, etc. from the instant address.
On April 5, 2017, the court of first instance served a notice on the date of sentencing at the court of first instance by mail on the Defendant, but was not served as a closed door absence. On April 21, 2017, the court served a notice on the date of sentencing at the court of first instance by means of delivery to the Defendant again on April 21, 2017 (the notice is deemed to be served on April 21, 2017). On April 26, 2017, the court sentenced the first instance judgment that accepts all the Plaintiff’s claims. On April 27, 2017, the original copy of the judgment at the court of first instance was served to the Defendant on April 27, 20
Accordingly, on May 26, 2017, the court of first instance ordered the defendant to serve a public notice on the original copy of the judgment of first instance on the order of service by public notice on the original copy of the judgment of first instance on June 10, 2017, and the service by public notice on the original copy of the judgment of first instance became effective on June 10, 2017, and on February 2, 2018, the period for appeal by public notice for the second-
The defendant's assertion as to the legitimacy of the appeal.