All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In light of the method, frequency, etc. of each of the crimes of this case, each of the crimes of this case is not good, and the defendant has the record of having been punished several times due to the theft by similar veterinary methods, and the defendant is not well aware of the fact that he/she committed each of the crimes of this case, and again, even though he/she is a repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, he/she again committed each of the crimes of this case, which is disadvantageous to the defendant. The fact that all of the crimes of this case are recognized by the defendant

In addition, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, and considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unfluent so that it cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the above assertion by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.