logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.06.19 2018누79201
장애인차별진정기각결정 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the disposition are as stated in the part concerning the "1. Reasons why the disposition was taken" as stated in the 2-5th of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification as follows. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2-3 pages 1-2 b.

paragraphs (c) and (c)

subsection (b) shall be deleted.

3 The first box, the first box, "D....." shall be raised to "B.."

3 The second petition of the first box, next to the 3th box, shall be sealed as “instant petition,” and the second petition of the first instance trial shall be pronounced as “instant petition.”

4 - 1(e) on the pages.

subsection (b) shall be deleted.

4 The second letter box "...." in the following sentence shall be changed to "...."

4 The second sentence "the second order" in the second sentence below the second sentence shall be deemed to be "the instant decision", and the second sentence in the first instance judgment shall be deemed to be "the instant decision".

4 The 5th page beginning on the last 4th parallel shall be as follows:

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 6, Eul evidence 6, and the purport of whole pleadings]

2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the relevant statutes are the same as the entry of "2. related Acts and subordinate statutes" written in 5-7 of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Whether the decision of this case is legitimate

A. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the same as that of the 7th decision of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the reasons for this Court’s explanation are as stated from 12th to 17th to 6th to 6th to 17th to the court of first instance; and (b) thus, it is citing this in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

4. Conclusion.

arrow