A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 6, 2013, at around 11:00, the Defendant: (a) entered the victim C’s “D” point of the victim’s operation in Seopopopool B; (b) laid down a brush in the display belt, spiting the drinking-water, glutinous rice boms, etc., which had been spit in several drinking-water in the display belt; and (c) continued to brea the victim’s husband E and the victim, who had worked in the main room, brought the Defendant into a large bath, and boomed the Defendant with approximately 20 minutes of drinking-water, such as drinking-water and drinking-water in the display belt; and (d) her husband E and the victim, who had been working in the main room, brought the Defendant a brut with the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's over-point business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 314 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition in consideration of the following: (a) the criminal records similar to those of the defendant in sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are several times; (b) the degree of damage inflicted on the victim at the time of the instant case; (c) the victim did not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the defendant; and (d)