All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and character, intelligence and environment, records of the crime, motive and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, there are substantial grounds to recognize that the lower court’s sentencing of the Defendant, which maintained the first instance judgment that sentenced 25 years to imprisonment with prison labor, is extremely unfair even when considering the circumstances asserted by the national defense counsel.

shall not be deemed to exist.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding a request for attachment order in light of the record, the lower court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, has the risk of recidivism and recidivism of sexual crimes against the Defendant.

In light of the above, it is justifiable to maintain the first instance judgment ordering the attachment of an electronic tracking device for a period of ten years, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.