The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.

From May 24, 2015, the Defendant was dispatched to C convalescent care hospitals under the jurisdiction of the Ethical nursing association. From June 10, 2016, around 10:00, C convalescent D, C convalescent 608, and as a person with dementia and a person with redemption, the Defendant, alone, was sitting in the wheelchairs in order to move the victim E (the age of 68) who, either flat or cannot express her intention to a bath.

In such a case, the defendant has a duty of care to move a patient to two medical care protectors or nurses to another medical care protectors or nurses, taking into account the safety of the patient and to ensure that the patient does not move to the patient during the process.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to sit the victim's body, and caused the victim's injury to the right side due to the negligence of failing to live the victim's body, leaving the right side of the wheel so that the part of the victim's right side of the wheel spons, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment.

In light of the following circumstances, the defendant cannot be found guilty of the facts charged as evidence of the application by the prosecutor. Thus, the defendant is found not guilty according to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment is to be publicly announced pursuant to Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(1) According to the records, two persons (F, Defendant) in charge of the protection of outpatients who were hospitalized in a convalescent hospital were examined. On June 10, 2016, the fact that the victim's hole was first discovered in the buckbucks, and the defendant was seated in the wheelchairs so as to attract the victim at around 10:00 on June 5, 2016, and there was no special circumstance that the right bridge was cut off on the wheel side, and the fact that the prosecution of this case was instituted against the defendant can be acknowledged.