1.The judgment of the first instance court, including any claims added in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

The defendants are the defendants.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as follows: “The new construction cost of KRW 400,000,000 shall be 400,000, and the construction period shall be from December 15, 2011 to March 15, 2012; “The construction cost of the construction shall be 1/100, and the construction shall be 1/100, shall be determined by Defendant C”; “The construction work shall be completed on March 15, 2012;” “The construction cost of the construction work of this case shall be 40,000,000,” “The construction work of this case shall be 17 and 18 shall be deleted;” “The construction work of this case shall be 13, 2014,” “The construction work of this case shall be 13,000,000,” and “the construction work of this case shall be citing each “an appraiser” in the main sentence of Article 201 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be modified.”

2. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this part of the claim for damages in lieu of defect repair is that the 3th 16th th 16th th th th th th th 16th th th th th th th th 8th th th th th 5th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st

Where the repair of defects is required due to defects in the contractor's contract construction work, if the contractor is the taxpayer under the Value-Added Tax Act, and the defect repair falls under the supply of services that have been used or will be used for his own business, the value-added tax