logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.10 2014누72813
부정당업자제재통보처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial of the first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and the first instance court’s determination rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion of abuse of discretionary power, even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court were to show each description of evidence Nos. 26 through 32 submitted in the trial of the first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning for the judgment of the court concerning this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is decided to accept this as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

2. If so, the decision of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against it is without merit, and it is dismissed as per Disposition.

arrow