Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the judgment of the court below against Defendant A and the part of the acquittal (the part of the crime No. 1 in the judgment of the court of first instance Ⅴ.).

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance against Defendant A, the judgment of the court of first instance on the scope of the judgment of this court on the charge of forging part of private documents and uttering of the above investigation documents against Defendant A among the facts charged, the judgment of the court of first instance acquitted each of the charges, and acquitted each of the charges against Defendant A, and convicted Defendant A of the remaining facts charged against Defendant A.

Defendant

A appeals against the guilty portion, and the prosecutor appeals against the acquittal portion excluding the forgery and use of each private document and each of the above investigation documents listed in the list of crimes (hereinafter referred to as "the list of crimes") Nos. 5 and No. 37, No. 4, a year of the list of crimes listed in the judgment of first instance among the acquittal portion, and the remainder of the acquittal portion and the acquittal portion except the forgery and use of each investigation document listed in the list of crimes No. 5, No. 5, No. 4, a year of the list of crimes in the list of crimes in the list of crimes in the judgment of first instance in the judgment of first instance in the judgment of first instance in the judgment of first instance in the judgment of first instance in the judgment of first instance against Defendant A are divided, and the scope of the judgment of this court in the judgment of first instance in the judgment of first instance is limited to the acquittal portion of each private document listed in the list of crimes in the list of crimes in the list of crimes, and the remainder of each investigation document, and the remainder of the acquittal portion excluding forgery and use.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below against the defendant A (the judgment of the court below of first instance against the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below of first and second) is too unreasonable. The punishment of the court below against the defendant (the judgment of the court below of first and second) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant C(1) and misunderstanding of the legal principles did not know at all about the fact that Defendant C was committing the crime of fraud, and Defendant C intended to look at it as a monthly salary, and thus did not know about whether to conclude a sales contract between A and AE, and whether to pay the purchase price.