The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is advantageous to the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and against it, and that the punishment should be determined in consideration of equity with the case of the judgment at the same time with the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act as stated in the judgment of the court below. However, while the defendant alleged that he sold the vehicle of this case, but the defendant's wife did not actually purchase it, although the defendant had been punished several times as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving), he again conducted a driving without a license even though he had the record of punishment several times. In particular, on December 11, 2014, the defendant was indicted as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) and was sentenced by the Gwangju District Court for the promotion of the head of the Gwangju District Court, and the defendant again appeared in the court to be sentenced to the judgment and was sentenced to the said judgment, the defendant did not seem to have done the driving without a license of this case. In addition, the defendant's assertion that the above punishment of this case was unfair, considering the circumstances, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, age, age, and circumstances.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.