A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the support of Suwon Fagwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 17, 2013.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in contracting business in C in the form of “franchis”.

1. On February 8, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement that “A victim E will complete the construction of a newly built multi-family house located in the Dong-gu Daejeon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F by lending a license for Furme General Construction (State) to the victim E, and the total cost would be KRW 920 million, and the total cost would be KRW 920,000,000,000,000,000,000 won as the completed portion, would be paid as the down payment, and the Defendant would faithfully perform the contract as the down payment.”

However, the fact is not to pay the down payment to C, which is the main body of the construction, but not to pay the down payment, the defendant received the down payment at his own discretion to use it, and there is no particular plan or preparation for the construction, and even if he receives the down payment, he did not have the intention or ability to proceed with the construction

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim under the same day as the down payment, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On March 2, 2010, the Defendant stated that “In the construction site of multi-family house in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City F, the Defendant would deduct the construction cost as much as the amount of money that C would have lent if the construction cost would have to receive from the party upon the commencement of the construction work, to the victim’s lending four insurance and other expenses, such as industrial accident insurance and other expenses necessary for the progress of the construction work.”

However, in fact, since most of the above multi-family house was planned to be used for the personal purpose rather than the construction cost of the above multi-family house with money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to repay the above borrowed amount in the way of deducting the above borrowed amount from the construction cost.