Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall sell cosmetics which have damaged the packaging, entries or labeling of cosmetics.

Nevertheless, on July 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sold cosmetics produced by Meresh Company in the name of “B” in the Internet shopping mall, such as Gmarket; (b) sold one “Sapex” produced by Meresh Company through the Internet shopping mall; and (c) sold bar codes, as determined by the Minister of Food and Drug Safety, at the Internet shopping mall around 11, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Purchase product photographs, the closure details at 11 times each, and each product room and bar code photographs;

1. Resolution of the Fair Trade Commission and certificate of multi-level marketing business registration;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. According to the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts, Articles 36(1)4 and 16(1)4 (generally) of the Cosmetics Act, and the selection of fines (see, e.g., evidence duly admitted and examined by the court), the Mesa case Korea limited company has distributed cosmetics produced by the Mesa case corporation using a closed channel in the form of door-to-door sales in Korea. Therefore, the Mesa case limited company does not interfere with the fact that the Mesa case code of the Mesa case does not constitute a labeling prohibited from damage under the Cosmetics Act even if the Mesa code of the Mes case is not a standard bar code, but a Mesa

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;