The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant on the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable.

2. The extent of damage to each of the instant crimes is not relatively much severe, and the fact that the victim agreed with the victim to commit the instant property damage is favorable to the Defendant.

However, even though the defendant had been punished for the same crime, he/she again committed each of the crimes of this case; there is no particular circumstantial relationship or change of circumstances that would reduce the sentence of the court below in the trial at the trial; and in full view of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable because the defendant's punishment is too too too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's improper argument in sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.