Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 15, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) the person who is engaged in driving of unregistered architecture; (b) around October 19:05, the Defendant driving of the above Oba, and then changing the two-lanes into one-lane course in the middle of the two-lane distance from the direction of the point where the road is located in the main intersection of Boba-si, Boba-si.
In such cases, when it is likely to obstruct the normal passage of other vehicles running on the direction of the change, a person engaged in driving on the off-to-land shall not change course, and he/she has the duty of care to give prior notice of change of course and to prevent accidents by safely changing the lane by operating the direction, etc. in advance.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and changes the lanes.
A collision between the chief aspect of the D Al-to-kin car driven by the victim C(38 years of age, South) who is driving one-lane in the same direction and the left-hand side of the Defendant's driving, and the central separation zone set up on the left-hand side of the driving direction of the damaged vehicle, which caused the collision to conflict with the central separation zone set up on the left-hand side of the driving seat of the
Accordingly, the Defendant caused physical damage equivalent to KRW 6,795,380 of the repair cost by destroying the above damaged vehicle due to occupational negligence.
2. On the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a 5km section of the road in the vicinity of the village of the main road in the same city, starting from the front of the Taecheon Apartment apartment in the Ycheon-si, Taecheon-si without a driver’s license.
3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is driving the otobane as stated in paragraph (1) above, which was not covered by mandatory insurance in the section as stated in paragraph (2) above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Police in relation to C.