1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The answer 109m2 (hereinafter “D land”) was divided into 534m2 on December 24, 1971 before the land substitution.

On April 25, 1972, the land of this case was replaced by the land of 2,063 square meters (hereinafter “C land”) in the Gu-U.S. Si, Gu-si, the land of this case was replaced by the land of 501 square meters before the land substitution (hereinafter “land before the land substitution”).

B. On June 30, 1965, the deceased U (the deceased on December 18, 2005) received the registration of transfer of ownership for reasons of sale on March 1, 1947 from the deceased V for 537/639 shares of land C.

C. On March 31, 1998, the Gu and America completed the registration of initial ownership by subrogation due to the sharing of net U(537/639 shares) and net V(102/639 shares) with respect to D land.

On May 14, 2004, the deceased U completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each of the above shares to the Plaintiff on May 13, 2004.

E. The deceased on March 25, 1945, the deceased on March 25, 1945, and the heir was the heir W (Provided, That the deceased on March 1, 1913, the South-Nam X was the unmarried death).

The deceased on November 20, 1986. The heir died on November 20, 1986. The heir was the wife Y (the deceased on April 1, 1987), Z (the deceased on January 21, 2008), Z (the deceased on January 21, 2008), son E (mariend Women), F (mariend Women), Ma AB (the deceased on April 2, 1967) of the deceased AA (the deceased on April 10, 199), her wife G, AB (the appointed party, the Defendant (the appointed party, the Defendant B), her wife, children of the deceased on April 24, 1986), MaC (the children of the deceased on April 24, 1986), and LW, who are children of the deceased.

F. The heir of the network AB had wife M, N, E, and E, and the heir of the network had wife P, AF, R, and S.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 4, and 8 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleading

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff alleged that the Plaintiff purchased the net V shares (102/639 shares, hereinafter “instant shares”) of the land before the land substitution was divided into D land, and the Plaintiff donated the entire land of this case to the Plaintiff.