logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.10.31 2018전고35
특수강도
Text

This case shall not be under the jurisdiction of the court.

Reasons

1. On May 30, 2013, the applicant for an attachment order, who was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for special robbery, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on February 27, 2018.

After the completion of the execution of the sentence as above, the person who requested the attachment order had lived while driving as an agent, etc., but has failed to pay for the income but failed to pay for living expenses.

On May 28, 2018, at around 02:18, the person who requested the attachment order who is in charge of the crime, shall carry with him the gate, hat, Makk, and transition (15cm in length) to be used for the crime in the residence of the person who requested the attachment order in Seo-gu in Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and return to 15cm in Gwangju, Gwangju, Seo-gu and find the object of the crime.

On May 28, 2018, at around 04:55, the victim E in Gwangju Mine-gu operated by the victim E, and at the convenience store, the victim F, who is female employees, (n, 27 years of age), confirmed that the victim F, within the convenience store, was mixed with each other, and entered the convenience store, made it impossible for the victim F, who was in the knife, to resist the victim F, to resist the victim F, by "in return for money" and sound, while putting a deadly weapon for the knife to the victim F, and the victim F, who was in the knife at the place, took a knife of the cash of KRW 200,000,000,000, which is 200,000 won of cash owned by the victim E.

On May 30, 2013, a person who requested an attachment order was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for special robbery, etc. by the Gwangju District Court, and again committed robbery after the execution of the sentence was completed on February 27, 2018. As a result of the investigation conducted by the Protection Monitoring Office prior to the request, the risk of recidivism is assessed as “highness” and thus, risk of re-prevention of robbery is likely.

2. Determination

A. According to the record of the facts of recognition and the significant facts in this court, ① the applicant for an attachment order on July 13, 2018, 2018, Gohap 242, the Defendant is guilty of the facts constituting a special robbery as stated in paragraph 1 of the above Article.

arrow