logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.11.03 2014고단1331
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 14:30 on August 3, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.176%, driven a Brano-car car over about 4 km from the Do in front of the Do to the road in front of the Cheongju-gu, Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) was driving a car at around 14:30 on the same day as the above paragraph (1) and was driving the car at the speed of 60 km per hour in the direction of the intersection in the direction of the direction of the intersection. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle under the influence of drinking, while a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle is unable to drive the motor vehicle normally due to the influence of drinking, and has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and found the victim C(40 years old) driving car (D) late later, and did not avoid it, and did not go against the Defendant’s driver’s left-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-off of the said car.

As a result, the Defendant driven the said car in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and suffered injury such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood that requires approximately two weeks medical treatment to the victim C.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph 2, destroyed a car above C driving’s repair cost of KRW 1,019,357 due to the accidents described in the foregoing paragraph 2, and escaped without taking necessary measures to prevent danger on the road and ensure smooth communication, notwithstanding C’s trends.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police in relation to C.

arrow