logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.09.27 2013고단2228
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BP car.

1. On June 24, 2013, the Defendant was driving the said car at around 05:50 on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) and driving the said car at around 05:50 on June 24, 2013, along the three-lane road of the three-lane line in front of the Gyeongdo-Eup, Chang-do Special Metropolitan City 720-8 Cultural Center.

At the time, the victim C(21 years of age) was driving on the Otoba, and the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle was obliged to take a duty of care to prevent the accident by safely driving the front and right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, in order to turn to the left without neglecting this, the defendant's negligence changed the right side of the victim's driver's vehicle into two lanes consecutively and caused the above victim's driver's driver's vehicle to shock the upper right side.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the climatic and climatic salt, etc., which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment on the above victim, suffered injury on the victim D (20 years of age) suffering from diversified salt, climatic salt, etc., requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment on the above part, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the above cliba at repair cost of KRW 480,000, while destroying the above cliba to the victim D (20 years of age).

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.089% at the above date and at the above place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written statement of C, D, and E;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. CCTV-cap photographs;

1. A medical certificate (C, D);

1.The application of written estimates to E-wheeled motor vehicles shall be 1.

arrow