Defendant

A 1,000,000 won, Defendant B 2,000,000 won, and Defendant C 1,000,000 won, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, from around 07:23 on September 29, 2013 to 07:30 on the same day, in the course of drunkly drinking in the “F store operated by the Victim E, Inc., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., the victims of Goyang-gu, Yangyang-gu, Yangyang-gu, and drinking expenses with other customers, he she driven away the disturbance, such as getting off her clothes from her clothes, and passing a large voice, on the ground that F employees only take part in other customers.

Accordingly, at around 07:35 on the same day, Defendant A contacted Defendant B and C to the effect that the said F had been detained. From around 07:42 on the same day, Defendant B and C searched to the above F, and up to 07:50 on the same day, Defendant B opened the receipt box, spos (POS) terminal, and liner liners on the bottom of the above store holder, and opened the liners of the FF employees G with a large amount of excreta, and Defendant C opened the chest of the said G two times, and tried to get off the said G from the place of sale, and prevented other customers from taking orders.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement of H;

1. Each statement of H, I, and G;

1. A survey report (verification of On-siteCCTV);

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Defendants: Articles 314 (1) and 30 ( point of interference with business and choice of fine) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.