Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a year.

However, from the final date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 20, 2010, Defendant A sentenced three years and six months of imprisonment, additional collection of KRW 98,1100,000,000 to the Busan District Court for the crime of taking property in breach of trust, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on May 22, 2013 in the Busan Detention House.

Defendant

On August 27, 2013, A was sentenced to 2 years of suspension of execution and 13 million won for the crime of taking property in breach of trust at the Busan District Court on June 27, 2013, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on May 3, 2014. On April 25, 2014, Defendant B was sentenced to 2 years of suspension of execution, 10 million won of fine, and 13 million won of additional collection at the Busan District Court on June 25, 2014, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on May 3, 2014. However, the crime Nos. 1 and 2 of the judgment cannot be judged simultaneously with the above final and conclusive crime, and the latter concurrent crime of Article 37 of the Criminal Act is not established.

Defendant

A from May 2007 to Busan Port Trade Union (hereinafter referred to as "port trade union") D, received a large amount of employment fee from those who intend to be employed in the port trade union, and retired from the port trade union around June 2009, and Defendant B is the wife of Defendant A.

On June 19, 2013, the Defendants made a false statement to the effect that, at the residence of the Defendants of the Nam-gu, Busan EMM 511 Dong 511, Defendant F and his wife wishing to be employed as a port union member, Defendant F and F will be employed within three months as a port union member, and Defendant F will be employed within the three-month period. Defendant F will be employed as a port union member with his or her child at his or her home time when he or she is employed as a port union member. Defendant F will also have his or her child at home and do not come to know about whether he or she is the head of the Ban with his or her home address, and he or she will be employed within the three-month period.

However, fact is that the port union member is a member of the port union upon the recommendation of the head of the branch office, etc., so it is not the defendant A or a member of the port union who retired from the port union.