1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as referred to in paragraph (2); and (b) the defendant’s assertion is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment as referred to in paragraph (3). As such, it is also acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The “real estate indicated in paragraph 1 of the order” in the 2nd page of the judgment of the first instance court shall be deemed to be “Songyang-dong, Seoyang-gu E large 602 square meters”.

(b) Forms 4, 12 and 16 of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.

(f) Codefendant C of the first instance court (hereinafter “Codefendant C of the first instance court”) filed a lawsuit against the Codefendant D's clan of the first instance court (hereinafter “Codefendant of the first instance court”) claiming the transfer of ownership by filing a claim for the transfer of ownership on January 9, 2014, “The Codefendant of the first instance court shall implement the procedure for the transfer of ownership on September 4, 1996 to Codefendant C of the first instance court,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive at that time.”

(c) Forms 4, 17 and 5 of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.

G. Co-Defendant C of the first instance trial completed the registration of ownership transfer, which was received on August 4, 2014, under the name of the co-Defendant C of the first instance trial on the ground of sale on September 4, 1996, on the same day, under the name of the co-Defendant C of the same registry office, for the instant land for which no registration was made on August 4, 2014. The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer, which was received on September 17, 2014, under the same date on September 17, 2014 by the same registry office, which was received on September 17, 2014.

(d) On No. 6th of the judgment of the court of first instance, “Defendant C and Defendant clan” shall be read as “Defendant”.

(e) the first instance.