The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted all of the charges of this case.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the establishment of coercion and the probative

The allegation that the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine as to Article 134-8 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure is not a legitimate ground for appeal, which is asserted in the final appeal that the Defendant was the ground for appeal or that the lower court did not have been subject to ex officio judgment against the Defendant.

Furthermore, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the aforementioned legal doctrine.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.