logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.09.22 2015고단2096
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 18:40 on July 5, 2015, the Defendant driven a DNA cargo vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.11% at a section of about 8km from the 19:09 on the same day from the place on which the Goyang-gu Do was not located in the Dong-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong Do-dong at approximately 19:09 on the same day.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving of DNA cargo vehicles;

On July 5, 2015, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 19:09, and driven the three-lane road in front of the Ccafeteria-dong, Busan Metropolitan City, Manyang-si, in the direction of the original party along the three-lane road in front of the Ccafeteria-dong.

At the same time, the Defendant had a duty of care to look at the situation of the driver, and to secure and proceed with the safety distance that can be avoided when the driver stops the car, as the Defendant was followed by the FL car driven by the victim E (the age 46).

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the cargo vehicle operated by the Defendant after the vehicle driven by the victim due to negligence while driving the stop signal as it is.

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the above victim in light of the light-line salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury to the victim G (V, 29 years of age) who was on board a car driving by the said victim, such as c,165,00 won of repair cost, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim, even though the said car was destroyed to the extent of KRW 3,165,000 of repair cost, the Defendant immediately stopped the said car and escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police statements made to E;

1. A report on detection of an employee and an employee;

arrow