logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2019.10.30 2019나51034
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant, from around 1991 to around 1991, engaged in gold manufacturing and manufacturing business, car-type design and related business, etc., with the trade name of “C”, and the Defendant, on August 26, 1997, engaged in the same kind of business (hereinafter “A”).

(2) A’s director (in-house director) from the time of its establishment to November 23, 2007 (in-house director) was employed as a director and a representative director of A and was in charge of A’s business affairs. A’s in-house director and the representative director of A was resigned on February 26, 2013. (2) D had a legal spouse married with the Defendant on September 2, 1992, and (3) was employed as a director of A (in-house director) from the time of its establishment to November 23, 2007 as a joint representative director with the Plaintiff.

At the same time, A was in charge of the fund management and accounting of A, and was employed as F and joint representative director from November 23, 2018 to July 22, 2019 from February 26, 2013.

shall serve as a senior executive officer.

B. On October 16, 2014, the Defendant and D filed a lawsuit for divorce, etc. against the Defendant. On September 23, 2015, the Defendant also filed a counterclaim against D, such as divorce (Seoul Family Court 2015dhap1140 (principal lawsuit), 2016dhap83 (Counterclaim), the first Busan Family Court 2014ddan2126 (principal lawsuit), 2015ddan14262 (Counterclaim). On October 20, 2015, the first Busan Family Court 2014ddan2014ddan1262 (Counterclaim) was subject to the jurisdiction of the collegiate division of the Busan Family Court.

) On November 17, 2016, the Busan Family Court accepted both the principal claim and the counterclaim on judicial divorce on the premise that both the Defendant and D are responsible for the failure of matrimonial relationship, and dismissed both the principal claim and the counterclaim claim claiming consolation money, and set the division of property and the bringing-up expense of the person with parental authority and their children. 2) Defendant and D appealed appealed to Busan High Court (Seoul High Court 2016Reu248 (principal claim), 2016Reu255 (Counterclaim)), and Busan High Court 2018 on February 2, 2018.

arrow