logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고정516
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in driving a vehicle B with low-speed.

1. On September 29, 2012, at around 07:10, the Defendant driven a vehicle owned by father C with a section of about 5 km from the front floor of the second apartment of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu to the old street of the court of prosecutor’s office located in the same Gu-dong from the front floor of the second apartment of the second apartment to the old street of the court of the same Gu-dong, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.109%.

2. The Defendant driving a vehicle above the temporary border like the preceding paragraph, and driving a four-lane road of the entrance distance of the prosecutor’s office in the office of the Nam-gu Office of the Seoul Metropolitan City, Ulsan-gu Office of the District Prosecutors’ Office toward the direction of an industrial tower from the boundary of the rooftop Park Cemetery to about 70 km each hour depending on two-lanes.

At that place, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to confirm whether there is a motor vehicle traveling along the intersection by reducing speed and checking the side well, and to prevent accidents by driving safely according to the traffic signal in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continues to proceed at the same speed in violation of the signal, even though the front-side signal is changed to a stop signal.

The part of the left side of the ENW ENW EF rocketing and other car driven by the victim D (the 53 years old, South) who enters the intersection from the right side of the vehicle to the intersection in accordance with the signals was collisioned with the front part of the Defendant's vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of business, suffered from the injured party G (the injured party G (the aged 22, the male) who was aboard the same victimized vehicle, about 4 weeks of satisfying sattoke, etc., requiring approximately 2 weeks of treatment. The Defendant suffered from each satch satfum satfum, etc. requiring approximately 22 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement D and F (including each written diagnosis);

1. The actual condition survey report and photographs;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

arrow