1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

2. Defendant B is punished by imprisonment for six months.

3...

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on September 23, 2015, and was released from Seoul Detention House on March 27, 2016 due to the cancellation of detention on April 11, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive on April 11, 2016, and the execution of the sentence was completed on December 15, 2017, and was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court and became final and conclusive on June 8, 2018.

Defendant

B On May 31, 2018, the Seoul Southern District Court was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 1, 2018.

Defendant

C On September 23, 2015, upon being sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on March 27, 2016, the detention cancellation was released from the Seoul Central District Court on March 27, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 17, 2016 and included the number of days of detention before the said final and conclusive judgment, the execution of the sentence was terminated. On December 15, 2017, the Seoul Southern District Court was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 1, 2018.

[2] On December 15, 2017, around 16:00, the Defendants appeared as a witness of the fraud case No. 404 of Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court 404, Seoul Southern District Court 2017 High Court 3597, and was notified of the right to refuse to take an oath.

Defendant

A In the first instance of May 2017, 201, the Prosecutor’s questioning to the effect that “I do not have any her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers, G, and the Defendants, who were in front of the E Public Security Center”, “I do not have any her her her her her her her her her her hers

testimony to the effect that “A witness is aware of the president of Korea, is committing a crime in China, or in Korea, and has been able to be able to have been able to have been involved by Defendant D with this content.

In the examination of the defense counsel "," it is well known where D intervenes through G, and the defendant is directly related to him.