(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.10.18 2017가단211551

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.10.18 2017가단211551

청구이의

Text

1. The defendant's notary public against the plaintiff is No. 397, 2009, No. 397, Nov. 24, 2009.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 24, 2009, the defendant attended D Law Firm as an agent of the plaintiff and E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "foreign company"), a joint guarantor, at his/her own qualification, a notary public as the debtor, and prepared a notarial deed stating that "if the plaintiff borrowed 74,070,000 won from the defendant on March 15, 2009 at an annual interest rate of 24% per annum, interest rate for delay, 20% per annum, and due date of payment on November 30, 2009, the non-party joint guarantor against the defendant shall be the joint guarantor, and if the plaintiff and the non-party company fail to perform the above loan obligations, they shall immediately be subject to compulsory execution, and a notarial deed as stated in the order (hereinafter referred to as "notarial deed of this case") was prepared according to the above entrustment.

B. The following is the power of attorney attached to the notarial deed of this case (hereinafter “the power of attorney of this case”).

CF G D C AE AH AE

C. The Defendant currently holds the current letter of payment dated April 1, 2009 (hereinafter “instant letter of payment”) stating “I will pay in full the above amounts by August 30, 2009.” In addition, I will undertake to pay in the 15th day of each month of interest on the amount. I will be held the letter of payment on April 1, 2009 (hereinafter “instant letter of payment”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. On November 3, 2009, the main point of the main argument is only the portion printed in the same text from the person who is the person who is the representative of the J's agency, and the several parts are written in the form of official seal, and the part which was written in the form of official seal is written in the form of official seal, and the non-party company's seal certificate and the plaintiff's seal certificate are affixed on the side to the person who is the representative of J, and then the letter of delegation in this case was delivered to the non-party company's corporate seal certificate, the plaintiff's seal certificate, and the plaintiff's seal certificate. (i) She, Me, Madi

유사 판례

-대구지방법원의성지원 2019.11.27 2018가단321

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.03.22 2017가합11464

-창원지방법원 2020.08.14 2020가단110505

-부산지방법원 2019.10.18 2018나60373

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.02.06 2017가단53055