The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the gist of the grounds for appeal is confession and reflects by the defendant, and the distance of the defendant's driving is relatively short, the punishment imposed by the court below (one hundred months of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the defendant, drinking driving is a crime that may cause damage to the lives and property of individuals as well as other unspecified persons, and requires strict punishment by reflecting the purpose of revision of the Road Traffic Act. In the past, the defendant has a history of punishment (one time of imprisonment, three times of suspended sentence of imprisonment, seven times of fines) several times due to a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act or a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-license). In particular, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for eight months at the Changwon District Court on September 2, 2011, and on May 17, 201, on the grounds that the defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence for six months due to a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Changwon District Court on May 17, 2012, and thus, it cannot be viewed that the above suspended sentence has become final and conclusive on August 4, 2012, and the defendant's allegation that the above suspended sentence had been executed for a period of five months or more.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.