Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has worked as a managing director of the partnership corporation B, and C has served as a representative director of the above corporation, and D has served as the head of the partnership of the above corporation.

1. The defendant was recruited with the above C or D, and since February 2016, the same year

3. At the B Partnership offices located in the head of Seoul E building F in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and D entered into a contract with the victim G to the land for investment in the return to farming and fishing village business in Leecheon-si.

Members are 3,000 members, and 2-300 million won per person are high, and the amount is paid to each member.

In addition, the business is secured by 11 billion won of the PF loan from the I Securities.

‘Falsely speaking, the victim continuously shown a certified copy of the register of J and K real estate in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, and “C, the representative of the B Union, has a claim of KRW 8 billion as a collateral on this land, and if the seizure of M and N is caused, it is necessary to pay KRW 100 million.

At present, 4 billion won has been entered in the O attorney-at-law office, and 4 billion won has been paid in return for 8 billion won of the right to collateral security.

If a person lends KRW 100 million, he/she shall receive KRW 4 billion and return KRW 200 million after borrowing KRW 100 million.

“A false statement was made that C had a claim of KRW 8 billion against the victim as above, and that if C releases the seizure of the said L, M, and N, it would be necessary to pay KRW 100 million, and the Defendant “C has a claim of KRW 8 billion against the victim’s 2 parcels outside of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.”

The sale of this amount of 4 billion won is already kept in the attorney-at-law office.

In addition, there is no problem and it is well progress because the sales contract for H land was concluded and the down payment was paid, and the internal payment was confirmed directly.

“A false representation was made.”

After that, the defendant, C, and D have made a loan agreement with the victim at the office of the above Partnership B around March 11, 2016.