1. The sales contract concluded on September 13, 2015 between the Defendant and B is KRW 18,00,000.

In fact, the Plaintiff has a taxation claim of KRW 39,901,460 as shown below as of July 8, 2016 with respect to B.

(3) On December 31, 2008, 209.31 December 31, 2009, 790 653, 780, 2010.30, 2010.30, 29.36, 201, 203.36, 201, 20.36, 201, 320, 320, 320, 20, 201.36, 20, 205, 20, 201.3, 206, 201, 20, 201, 31.3, 206, 205, 20, 201, 31, 206, 201, 31, 205, 206, 201, 31, 206, 201, 201.

[Based on the facts that there is no dispute, each entry in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including the serial number) and the purport of the entire argument, the establishment of fraudulent act was established, and the plaintiff had a tax claim which became due before and after the conclusion of the instant sales contract with Eul. Accordingly, since the plaintiff had a tax claim which became due before and after the conclusion of the instant sales contract, the tax claim of KRW 39,901,460 against the defendant is the preserved claim of the obligee's right of revocation.

In addition, B is the sole property of this case.