The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C-wing truck. On November 13, 201, the Defendant: (a) driven the above cargo vehicle around 18:25 on November 13, 201; and (b) driven the three-lane road in front of 559 in front of Si-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-do-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-

On November 13, 2011, the Defendant caused the death of the victim by occupational negligence due to cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral typhism in the F Hospital located in Sinung-si E in Sinung-si on November 13, 201.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant and his defense counsel did not use the Defendant’s bicycle riding on the part of the victim. However, the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no causal relationship between the Defendant’s act of shocking the bicycle and the victim’s death on the ground that the following vehicles, who followed the Defendant’s vehicle, shocked the bicycle, and the victim died. The Defendant asserted that there was no causal relationship between the Defendant’s act of shocking the bicycle and the victim’s death.

B. In light of the fact that the defendant's act was the only cause or directly cause of the victim's death. Thus, even if there was a different fact between the defendant's act and the victim's death, it is nothing more than that of the defendant's act or that of ordinary prediction.