logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.02.09 2015가단118108
소유권말소등기
Text

1. As to the plaintiffs, with respect to Non-Ycheon-si E Apartment No. 102, 601:

A. Defendant C is a deputy branch court of the Incheon District Court.

Reasons

1. Claim against Defendant C

A. 1) Defendant C is the deceased F (Death, Sept. 28, 2012; hereinafter “the deceased”).

After reporting the marriage on March 22, 1989, the agreement divorce was reported on December 23, 1996, and the agreement was reported again on November 12, 2001, and on May 6, 2005. Defendant C and the deceased were their children. Defendant C and the deceased were forged the marriage report and the agreement on division of inherited property, and based on this, the registration of the father-si E apartment No. 102 Dong 601 (hereinafter “instant real property”) owned by the deceased was completed by the Incheon District Court’s father-do Branch of Incheon District Court and the registration of the ownership transfer was completed under the receipt No. 13828 on February 18, 2013.

3) Meanwhile, on September 18, 2015, Plaintiff B lent KRW 4,00,000 to Defendant C. Accordingly, Defendant C’s registration of transfer of ownership is null and void under the foregoing paragraph 1. As such, Defendant C is obligated to implement the registration procedure for cancellation of the above transfer of ownership to the Plaintiffs, the heir of the Deceased, and Defendant C is obligated to pay KRW 4,00,000 borrowed from Plaintiff B as described in the foregoing paragraph 3.

(b) Judgment made by the confession of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Claims against Defendant National Bank, D, and D Forest Asset Management Loans

A. On March 22, 1989, Defendant C reported the marriage between the deceased and the deceased on March 22, 1989, and reported the divorce on December 23, 1996. On November 12, 2001, the Defendant C and the deceased reported the marriage with the deceased on May 6, 2005. Defendant C and the deceased were their children. (2) While Defendant C and the deceased maintained their living together with the deceased who were under the influence of the disease, they appear to have been dead immediately, and they were in mind moving the real estate of this case owned by the deceased to their own possession, the deceased’s report of marriage and the deceased’s heir, the deceased’s heir.

arrow