logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.21 2018나22359
매매대금
Text

1. 제1심 판결 중 피고 주식회사 크리에이티브�에 대한 부분을 취소하고, 원고의 피고...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 19, 2016, the Plaintiff and Defendant Baplus Co., Ltd.’s goods supply contract 1) the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Baplus”) on December 19, 2016.

Article 1 (Sale Details and brands) The supply of goods refers to the Plaintiff’s juxum stop product that is developed, designed, and produced by the Defendant Babler. In the event of the progress of the development and supply of goods, the payment order shall be deemed to have been completed in accordance with the payment method as set out in Article 6, and after the order, all matters related to the goods shall be supplied to the Plaintiff by the Defendant Babler. The brand and the ownership of the goods supplied under Article 2 (Co. 1 and brands) belongs to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff has the right to purchase exclusive sales in the Chinese country. The Plaintiff’s right to sell exclusive stores in the Chinese country is separate from the Plaintiff’s estimate. (hereinafter, omitted) Article 3(1) of the supply period shall be separate from the Plaintiff’s estimate, and the Plaintiff’s first order to supply the goods shall be made in consultation with the Plaintiff’s first order to ensure that the Defendant Babler complies with the payment method and the first order to supply the goods.

The order shall be deemed to have commenced after the completion of the payment, and 30% of the intermediate payment shall be paid after approval for the sold design of goods, and the remainder shall be 40% of the remainder.

arrow