Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or each of the following facts can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account Gap evidence Nos. 1 (Incompetence), Gap evidence No. 4 (Written Confirmation), and Gap evidence No. 2 (Incompetence) [the defendant's defense that each of the above documents was prepared and delivered without the plaintiff's intimidation or pressure, but it is difficult to acknowledge them only with the entries of evidence Nos. 2, 3, 5, and 6, and no other evidence to acknowledge them exists], Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 5 through 9, and the results of the submission of the financial transaction information to the Director of the Nonghyup Bank
1) Around May 2009, the Plaintiff lent KRW 4,000,000 to C via the Defendant, and around July 2009, lent KRW 3,000,000 to the Defendant.
B) On September 4, 2009, C gave C a loan of KRW 4,00,000 to the Plaintiff. (C) The Defendant did not deliver the above KRW 4,000,000 delivered to C to the Plaintiff on September 4, 2009 without delivering the loan of KRW 3,000,000 to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant borrowed the above KRW 3,000,000 to the Plaintiff on September 4, 2009, with the Defendant’s loan of KRW 7,00,000 (i.e., KRW 4,00,000,000) to pay the Plaintiff the total amount of the loan of KRW 3,00,000,000 to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the above loan of KRW 7,00,000,000,000) to the Defendant at his/her discretion around the issuance of the summary order of KRW 30,00,00,000 (hereinafter “the above loan of this case”).
The defendant on January 24, 2010