Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor and fines of KRW 5,000,00, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of KRW 8 months and fines of KRW 3,000,00.

Punishment of the crime

From July 4, 2017 to September 7, 2017, the Defendants concurrently operated Dtel B 309 of Seongdong-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and Defendant A took charge of the overall management and fund management of the said commercial sex acts establishments, Defendant B took charge of managing customers and female employees, and employed Defendant B took charge of managing the said commercial sex acts on the condition that half of the profits of commercial sex acts are divided into half of the profits of the said commercial sex acts, Defendant B took charge of managing the said commercial sex acts, Defendant B took charge of managing the women and female employees, and Defendant B took charge of managing the female women F and G, etc. against many unspecified male customers, and directed female employees to engage in sexual intercourses and sexual intercourses.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written statement;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Reporting on the closure and investigation of the cell phone screen (business establishments).

Application of Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic shall be concurrently punished by imprisonment and a fine pursuant to Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for a suspended sentence (the following favorable circumstances):

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture;

1. The grounds for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment are as follows: (a) the act of arranging sexual traffic with the reasons for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have many social cancellations, such as the commercialization of sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals; and (b) the Defendants arranged sexual traffic with foreign women to commit such crime; and (c) advertisement and brokerage using a high radio wave media.

On the other hand, the defendants did not have the same criminal record, and the defendants led to confession and reflect each of the crimes of this case.