1. The defendant C and D shall be jointly and severally liable

A. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 18,554,100 and its KRW 13,00,000.

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant E, F, and G

A. The plaintiffs asserted that the above defendants suffered property loss not recovered in the amount of 18,554,100 won and 6,620,000 won from among the investment funds contributed to the investment business of Defendant Company’s national tax payment shares (the shares paid by the State in lieu of taxes to the Korea Asset Management Corporation, etc. that entrusted the sale to the Korea Asset Management Corporation, etc.) due to the illegal act received by the Defendants and the inducement of investments, etc., and they seek against the above defendants for compensation for damages arising from joint tort.

B. According to each counter-proof of evidence No. 1, No. 1, No. 1, No. 41, and No. 51 as to the legitimacy of the above assertion, the plaintiffs filed a criminal complaint against the above Defendants on the charge of fraud responding to the alleged facts, but upon investigation by the investigative agency, the above Defendants received a non-prosecution disposition regarding the alleged facts.

Meanwhile, according to Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 23, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and Eul's evidence Nos. 3 (including partial Nos. 1 through 3; hereinafter the same shall apply) and each financial transaction order, the plaintiff's introduction of the defendant G's female her female her female she explained about the above defendant's investment project from the above defendant's office, and upon the above defendant's recommendation to visit the above defendant's company, the above defendants publicized the defendant's investment in the paid-in stocks (including additional allowances for introduction when attracting other investors) through the explanation and consultation with the defendant's company's office, and notified the defendant's company's investment in the above business conducted by the defendant's company directly face with the plaintiff's company Gap, and the defendant Eul directly received approximately KRW 2 million out of the investment funds of the plaintiff Eul, and the defendant G also delivered the investment certificate, etc. to the above plaintiff or provided several consultations with the defendant's above company.