logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.07.19 2017고단863
공갈등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In the event that the Defendant is employed at a 11-month restaurant with the total 11 victim who is a restaurant business proprietor, committed attempted conflicts, and obstructed business affairs, and the Defendant left the restaurant and left the place of business after causing the disturbance, then he/she has committed a violation of the provisions, such as lack of hygiene, necessity of employee's health certificate, indication of origin, advertisement water management, etc., unless he/she pays a monthly salary as prescribed by the Labor Standards Act;

The purpose of “to report to the government offices” was to threaten the owners to report to the government offices, and actually to raise money against the owners by filing a non-discriminatory civil petition at the government offices and franchise headquarters.

Therefore, on April 30, 2013, the Defendant was unable to perform funeral services by reporting 20,000 won to the public office while reporting to the public office by the public office, when he/she takes a bath to the victim, while he/she reported 20,000 won to the public office when he/she went to the public office when he/she was retired from office because it was short of one hour after hiring the above restaurant.

Although 70,000 won per day was required for intimidation, the victim was not able to refuse payment and failed to do so.

The Defendant, from May 1, 2013 to April of the same month, filed a false report with the Jeonjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Cheongjin-gu Office and the Agricultural Products Quality Manager on several occasions to the effect that “E sells imported meat and has poor sanitary conditions, and is engaged in employees who do not have health symptoms,” thereby hindering the victim’s restaurant business through a deceptive scheme, and from April 30, 2013 to April of the same month, the Defendant had the victim undergo an inspection by the Jeonjin-gu Office of the Jeonjin-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, and from April 30, 2013.”

5. From 12:00 to 13:00 each day from 13:00 a.m., the creamlor for seven days, the victim’s restaurant business interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by forcing the victim to not make proper orders, ices, and accounts of the restaurant.

Defendant 2.

arrow