beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,958,884 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from June 3, 2015 to August 18, 2016.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The building owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant building”) is a building with the second underground and second underground floors with the second underground floors with the second underground floors with the second underground floors, the swimming pool with the first underground floors, the first underground floors with the parking lot and restaurant, the lower court, the second and third floors with the second and third floors with the second and third floors with the lower underground floors as detached houses.
B. On April 1, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant, with the exception of the first floor on the ground, as KRW 200,000,000,000 on the date of the contract, and KRW 50,000,000 on the date of September 30, 2013, and KRW 50,000,000 until March 31, 2014, and the rent from May 1, 2014 to March 4, 200,00 (the partial reduction in relation to the installation of facilities prior thereto). The lease agreement was concluded with the term of the lease agreement to be leased from April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2015.
C. On April 1, 2013, the Plaintiff paid KRW 100,000 out of the lease deposit to the Defendant. D.
The Plaintiff, while running a bath, health club, etc. in the instant building, terminated the instant lease agreement with the Defendant’s consent on December 10, 2014.
E. On February 3, 2015, the Defendant deducted charges for causing traffic congestion from KRW 1,204,250, road occupation fees (parking lots) KRW 553,70, 166,160, and interest rate of KRW 50,000,000, from the unpaid lease deposit when returning the lease deposit to the Plaintiff.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. Plaintiff 1) The traffic inducement charges, road occupation fees (parking lots) and groundwater usage fees, which the Plaintiff deducted in the return of lease deposit, are the expenses that the Defendant is obliged to bear, and thus, cannot be recognized. (2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to reduce the amount from KRW 200,000,000 to KRW 100,000,000, the interest on the unpaid lease deposit cannot be acknowledged.
3. The instant lease agreement is concluded.